relation type

[aisbergde]

Expected Behavior

it should be possible to document several relation types:

• FK-PK (column based)
• ParentColum-ChildColumn (column based)
• Source object - target object (object based: table, view, routine)
• ...

The definition should be flexible by assigning a "Relation Type" (any text) to a relation

The output for different relations should not be mixed but separated:

• separate diagrams
• separate columns in list views

Current Behavior

only one relation type exists: FK-PK-relation
virtual FK-PK-relations relations can be defined using SchemaMeta XML

Possible Solution

when the new planned XMLSchema will be implemented, based on database.schema.table.column (additional to the existing schema based on table.column) this could be implemented.