Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

srfi 145 compliance an srfi 110 compatibility #10

Merged

Conversation

0-8-15
Copy link
Contributor

@0-8-15 0-8-15 commented Mar 3, 2021

No description provided.

- as my eyes are aging adjacent ")(" are increasingly offensive to read

- alternative Scheme readers (e.g., SRFI 110) may translate those to
  alternative means

Summary: please do me the favor and don't do it.  ;-)
SRFI 145 requires the special form `assume` to take two or more
arguments: 1.) The object to test 2.) a message to report to the user
rest...) arguments as for `error`.
@amirouche
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM!

@arthurgleckler arthurgleckler merged commit 744f66b into scheme-requests-for-implementation:master Mar 6, 2021
@arthurgleckler
Copy link
Contributor

arthurgleckler commented Mar 6, 2021 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants