Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Fix a mistake in the comment for vector= #1

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 18, 2019
Merged

Fix a mistake in the comment for vector= #1

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions vector-lib.scm
View file
Open in desktop
Expand Up @@ -675,13 +675,13 @@
;;; (ELT=? <value> <value>) -> boolean
;;; Determine vector equality generalized across element comparators.
;;; Vectors A and B are equal iff their lengths are the same and for
;;; each respective elements E_a and E_b (element=? E_a E_b) returns
;;; a true value. ELT=? is always applied to two arguments. Element
;;; each respective elements E_a and E_b (elt=? E_a E_b) returns a
;;; true value. ELT=? is always applied to two arguments. Element
;;; comparison must be consistent wtih EQ?; that is, if (eq? E_a E_b)
;;; results in a true value, then (ELEMENT=? E_a E_b) must result in a
;;; results in a true value, then (ELT=? E_a E_b) must result in a
;;; true value. This may be exploited to avoid multiple unnecessary
;;; element comparisons. (This implementation does, but does not deal
;;; with the situation that ELEMENT=? is EQ? to avoid more unnecessary
;;; with the situation that ELT=? is EQ? to avoid more unnecessary
;;; comparisons, but I believe this optimization is probably fairly
;;; insignificant.)
;;;
Expand Down