Add TOC to README #157
Closed
Add TOC to README #157
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This is auto-generated: https://scientific-python.org/specs/ and has all the information in the README table, but will also automatically include additional information that may be hard to include in the README (for example which projects have endorsed the SPEC and what its status is). I would rather not have too much additional manual work needed. I also don't like having to manually format tables. Is the website not sufficient? If not, maybe we should consider improving the |
|
Okay, fair point. I will close this. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I do not want to click on each and every folder to see what the SPECs are about, so would be nice to have a TOC like https://github.com/astropy/astropy-APEs . 馃槄
I am not sure if these are the columns you want, so I am happy to modify the columns. Would be nice for outsider to see the statuses of the SPECs at a glance too. And once SPEC is accepted, would be nice to have a permanent DOI people can cite.