-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[MRG] Fixed equality check in pprint #13584
Merged
TomDLT
merged 3 commits into
scikit-learn:master
from
NicolasHug:fix_pprint_changed_only_array
Apr 9, 2019
Merged
[MRG] Fixed equality check in pprint #13584
TomDLT
merged 3 commits into
scikit-learn:master
from
NicolasHug:fix_pprint_changed_only_array
Apr 9, 2019
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jnothman
approved these changes
Apr 6, 2019
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ def _changed_params(estimator): | |||
init_params = signature(init_func).parameters | |||
init_params = {name: param.default for name, param in init_params.items()} | |||
for k, v in params.items(): | |||
if (v != init_params[k] and | |||
if (repr(v) != repr(init_params[k]) and |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice hack :)
TomDLT
approved these changes
Apr 9, 2019
jeremiedbb
pushed a commit
to jeremiedbb/scikit-learn
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 25, 2019
xhluca
pushed a commit
to xhluca/scikit-learn
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2019
xhluca
pushed a commit
to xhluca/scikit-learn
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2019
This reverts commit 465ecc6.
xhluca
pushed a commit
to xhluca/scikit-learn
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 28, 2019
This reverts commit 465ecc6.
koenvandevelde
pushed a commit
to koenvandevelde/scikit-learn
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 12, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reference Issues/PRs
Fixes #13583
What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes.
Equality checks for arbitrary objects are (very) tricky, so I decided to compare their
repr
.As long as no estimator recursively uses itself as a parameter, it should be fine.
Any other comments?