Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ENH: improve performance of the skewnorm cdf computation #15486
ENH: improve performance of the skewnorm cdf computation #15486
Changes from all commits
be1ae99
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i haven't read the paper yet, but is it more accurate or much faster than equation 3? Is it a good approximation for all values of the shape parameter?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There are several algorithms outlined in the paper that have differing accuracy and speed, depending on the sign and absolute values of the shape parameter. Unfortunately, It seems rather hard or impractical to account for all different values while choosing the "best" algorithm. Equation 14 is just as accurate as the current implementation but as seen in my previous comment here: #15486 (comment), the accuracy isn't equal. The hard part is knowing which algorithm to choose from given the combination of
x
andshape
and whether or not that combination represents a point at the tail of the distribution.