-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DOC: remove doc/seps/technology-preview.rst #2766
Conversation
no objection here (I could write a "governance in scipy" message. :) with the message "works pretty well" |
can we hold off on that for a few days? @ EuroScipy is a good time to discuss things like governance in person. |
I think Josef was joking ... As the 'governance' person though - for the record - it does look as though scipy is working pretty well as an organization at the moment. And maybe that means it's a good time to nail down a gentle governance model that can protect that for the future. |
I know he was joking in the last sentence. The first one is serious though, and may trigger the second one. I agree with your take on things @matthew-brett, some nailing down may be in order. |
@rgommers no problem with me, @matthew-brett joking only with the title. But as a status update (de-facto, not de-jure) (from my perspective as semi-retired scipy developer) |
Aha - the discussion begins! |
I better switch to my statsmodels tabs and open windows. |
I'll defer to people with more organizational gravitas to propose removing nontechnical content. |
@argriffing I think we can still merge this soon, no problem. Cleaning up docs/website/stuff-like-this is quite useful. |
OK re-opening. Maybe these meta issues like the development of processes of development of scipy have been discussed at euro-scipy? |
After a few beers I'm afraid the current model has been classified as a tyranny:) More seriously, we did discuss a roadmap to 1.0 in some detail. I'll try to post something coherent soon. Processes were not discussed in as much detail, but I think we can pick up that discussion also. |
OK going to merge this PR, because removing this file is the only sensible thing to do. It doesn't contain anything useful; there never was a |
DOC: remove doc/seps/technology-preview.rst
Clean up the docs a bit. See #2762.