DOC: update 0.14.0 release notes. #3286
Conversation
|
|
||
|
|
||
| New features | ||
| ============ | ||
|
|
||
| ``scipy.interpolate`` improvements |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Note: the new features list is probably easier to read if there is only one level of sections below it.
I.e., only ------- titles and not ^^^^^^. I.e., I'd do away with the "scipy.XXX improvements" titles.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Agreed, I don't like the current formatting much. Will change it for the whole file.
|
Changes Unknown when pulling c1f31ab on rgommers:014-relnotes into * on scipy:master*. |
| - sparse matrices can now be indexed with 64-bit integers, and are therefore no | ||
| longer limited to ``2^31`` nonzero elements. | ||
| - ``__numpy_ufunc__`` in combination with numpy 1.9 | ||
| - performance optimizations |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"""
Significant performance improvement in CSR, CSC, and DOK indexing speed.
"""
NB. the PR with the DOK changes is still waiting for review...
|
More stuff:
Backward incompatible changes:
|
|
Thanks @pv, all comments addressed. |
|
Merging. |
|
|
||
| - Significant performance improvement in CSR, CSC, and DOK indexing speed. | ||
| - When using Numpy >= 1.9 (to be released in MM 2014), sparse matrices function | ||
| correctly when given to arguments of ``np.dot``, ``np.multiply`` and other |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We now know that ufuncs do not work for sparse matrices with duplicate indices at present... I'm not sure if this strong a statement is appropriate unless that is fixed before the release.
@pv, @jnothman: could one of you suggest wording for the sparse matrix improvements?
@ev-br, @pv: same question for the
BPoly/PPolystuffAnything else notable that I missed?