TST: spatial.qhull: skip a test on 32-bit platforms #6347
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Test is numerically unstable and is reported to fail on 32-bit systems. See scipygh-6101
ev-br
added
the
backport-candidate
|
LGTM, thanks Evgeni. |
ev-br
removed
the
backport-candidate
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Test is (apparently) numerically unstable and is reported to fail on 32-bit systems. Intends to close gh-6101.
Note that a part of this test is already skipped on 32-bit platforms.
It would be good to get to the bottom of the failure at some point: is it really a limitation of an upstream QHull, or is it a test which is too optimistic. I'll open a separate ticket for this.
EDIT: gh-6348