Add link to published proceedings #70

jaberg · 2013-07-09T09:36:07Z

Add links to the README pointing to all previous years' published proceedings (P.S., where are they?)

scopatz · 2013-07-09T14:52:59Z

Well 2012 doesn't have its proceedings finished yet.

2011 is here: https://github.com/scipy/scipy_proceedings_2011

2010 is here: https://github.com/scipy/scipy_proceedings_2010

jaberg · 2013-07-09T15:16:45Z

Those are links to github source repos... I meant links to readable,
rendered final product. Where are the pdfs?

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Anthony Scopatz
notifications@github.comwrote:

Well 2012 doesn't have its proceedings finished yet.

2011 is here: https://github.com/scipy/scipy_proceedings_2011

2010 is here: https://github.com/scipy/scipy_proceedings_2010

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/70#issuecomment-20679412
.

scopatz · 2013-07-09T15:24:13Z

They are here: http://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/ but not even all of them. This website probably also needs an overhaul too...

jaberg · 2013-07-09T15:33:17Z

Is it part of the scope of this "tools" repo that there should be commands
to generate
(a) a single PDF with all the papers in it
(b) a web page with bibliographic info on it and links to single-paper PDFs
(including git hash of source)?

Are those commands implemented already to any degree? (How were those
previous conferences' web pages generated?)

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:24 AM, Anthony Scopatz
notifications@github.comwrote:

They are here: http://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/ but not even all
of them. This website probably also needs an overhaul too...

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/70#issuecomment-20681838
.

scopatz · 2013-07-09T15:35:54Z

These are all great questions that @stefanv and @jarrodmillman may or may not have an answer to... I certainly don't.

stefanv · 2013-07-09T16:32:39Z

@jaberg Yes, there are commands for generating a single PDF as well as a website with links to the papers + bibliographic information in BiBTeX format. Have a look at the Makefile in the publisher directory.

jaberg · 2013-07-20T15:06:20Z

@stefanv I don't really care to build the proceedings locally, I would like to:

put links on my academic web page to my own papers
have them be indexed by e.g. google scholar
know how to cite them

These are pretty standard for a conference/workshop so I hope you know what I mean... how do you see these things playing out?

jaberg · 2013-07-20T15:09:35Z

Also, just to be clear, I know I can put PDFs on my own website, it's just a little nicer to have links to an "official" proceedings site.

Could you put that auto-generated page up with the other ones at http://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/ ?

pedrohasselmann · 2013-10-10T13:41:21Z

Hi,

I agree with jaberg, I think it should be a better way to cite and index the scipy proceddings. I am a astronomer and I published a description of my method in the scipy proceedings 2013, so I would really like to cite it and not re-write it again in subsequent papers.

stefanv · 2013-10-10T14:28:39Z

@aterrel Do you have access to publish to conference.scipy.org? We have everything in place, the pages just need to be uploaded.

aterrel · 2013-10-10T15:02:12Z

Awesome. So conference.scipy.org is a sphinx generated site, but I haven't found anyone who actually has the sphinx source. Let me track that down, but I'll try to get it up by hand asap.

aterrel · 2013-10-10T20:08:30Z

What do people think about putting all the final docs on Figshare so you get a doi?

jaberg · 2013-10-10T20:11:26Z

Sounds good to me. Easier than uploading to ArXiv ?

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Andy R. Terrel notifications@github.comwrote:

What do people think about putting all the final docs on Figshare so you
get a doi?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/70#issuecomment-26086757
.

aterrel · 2013-10-10T20:13:48Z

So much easier since they don't require source, just pdf, and they give you a real doi. Arxiv gives you a arxiv number that is a stable.

@stefanv How do we do this for folks? Or do we send them emails that it is just happening?

ev-br · 2013-10-10T20:16:58Z

You can perfectly well upload a pdf to arxiv.

aterrel · 2013-10-10T20:55:39Z

@EvgeniBurovski Thank you for your correction, so let me clarify. Arxiv requires source for any latex generated pdf. Which would include the publications in the scipy proceedings. See http://arxiv.org/help/submit You are welcome to discuss these policies with arxiv.

After looking at both arxiv and figshare terms of service, this really looks to be a nightmare. I think the best would be if folks give us a arxiv or figshare id and we just display it.

jaberg · 2013-10-10T21:03:55Z

Thanks for looking into this, happy to click through figshare's website to
get an ID. Could I submit that as a PR once the sphinx docs is publishing
the PDF that I would submit to figshare?

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Andy R. Terrel notifications@github.comwrote:

@EvgeniBurovski https://github.com/EvgeniBurovski Thank you for your
correction, so let me clarify. Arxiv requires source for any latex
generated pdf. Which would include the publications in the scipy
proceedings. See http://arxiv.org/help/submit You are welcome to discuss
these policies with arxiv.

After looking at both arxiv and figshare terms of service, this really
looks to be a nightmare. I think the best would be if folks give us a arxiv
or figshare id and we just display it.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/70#issuecomment-26090966
.

aterrel · 2013-10-10T21:10:59Z

@jaberg Let's wait until the editors chime in here. I don't want to create a process that doesn't scale or work for the community.

@stefanv I did a make in the 2013 branch builder directory but I get pdfs. Is that what you to upload, I really need a webpage that indexes the webpages. Maybe I'm not seeing a command or something. I could just put the proceedings.pdf up, but right now it prints with a DRAFT watermark.

cc: @jarrodmillman @katyhuff

katyhuff · 2013-10-10T22:16:08Z

I haven't tried it, but I think you can print the pdf without the watermark if :

you go in here : https://github.com/scipy/scipy_proceedings/blob/2013/publisher/_static/status.sty
and set the watermark weight to 0.0.

or

you go in here : https://github.com/scipy/scipy_proceedings/blob/2013/publisher/_static/scipy.sty
and comment out take out the dependency on status.sty entirely.

stefanv · 2013-10-11T13:28:13Z

The source might have been uploaded with the pages?

aterrel · 2013-10-13T18:14:42Z

@stefanv @jarrodmillman @katyhuff I don't really have time to really debug what is going on. Can someone generate the output and send me what should go up?

katyhuff · 2013-10-14T00:42:14Z

Hm...
When I built it, there were a bunch of errors of the type :

*** Warning:
/Users/khuff/repos/scipy_proceedings/publisher/../output/jeschke/paper_stats.json
does not exist.

However, it seems to have built a stack of pdfs without the watermark.
Maybe there's something wrong with the proof, due to these missing json
stats files, but I'm not sure what it would be. Can you comment on that
@stefanv?

In any case, the generated pdfs can be downloaded here (for now, I'll
probably delete this in a week) :
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10060444/pdfs.zip . There's a main file
called proceedings.pdf and an individual pdf for each of the papers.

Katy

On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:14 AM, Andy R. Terrel
notifications@github.comwrote:

@stefanv https://github.com/stefanv @jarrodmillmanhttps://github.com/jarrodmillman
@katyhuff https://github.com/katyhuff I don't really have time to
really debug what is going on. Can someone generate the output and send me
what should go up?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/70#issuecomment-26223250
.

http://katyhuff.github.com

stefanv · 2013-10-14T10:45:53Z

Katy, do you have texlive-latex-extra installed? That is where the
tool lives that extracts the page numbers (pdfannotextractor).

aterrel · 2013-10-28T13:57:15Z

Does anyone know how the generate the appropriate html for the papers? I could just upload the pdf, but that seems inadequate...

stefanv · 2013-10-28T14:09:10Z

It's one of the Makefile targets.

aterrel · 2013-10-28T14:15:17Z

I don't see a make file in the repo. I tried the following which looked to work in older versions, but to no avail...

$ python publisher/build_html.py papers/
*** Warning: /Users/aterrel/Sites/scipy_proceedings/publisher/_static/institutions.json does not exist.
*** Warning: /Users/aterrel/Sites/scipy_proceedings/publisher/_build/toc.json does not exist.
/bin/sh: recode: command not found
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "publisher/build_html.py", line 29, in <module>
    html_from_tmpl(dest_fn+'.html', proc_dict, dest_fn)
  File "/Users/aterrel/Sites/scipy_proceedings/publisher/build_template.py", line 42, in html_from_tmpl
    content =  _from_template(src, config)
  File "/Users/aterrel/Sites/scipy_proceedings/publisher/build_template.py", line 14, in _from_template
    return template.substitute(config)
  File "/Users/aterrel/Sites/scipy_proceedings/publisher/tempita/__init__.py", line 173, in substitute
    result, defs, inherit = self._interpret(ns)
  File "/Users/aterrel/Sites/scipy_proceedings/publisher/tempita/__init__.py", line 184, in _interpret
    self._interpret_codes(self._parsed, ns, out=parts, defs=defs)
  File "/Users/aterrel/Sites/scipy_proceedings/publisher/tempita/__init__.py", line 212, in _interpret_codes
    self._interpret_code(item, ns, out, defs)
  File "/Users/aterrel/Sites/scipy_proceedings/publisher/tempita/__init__.py", line 225, in _interpret_code
    expr = self._eval(expr, ns, pos)
  File "/Users/aterrel/Sites/scipy_proceedings/publisher/tempita/__init__.py", line 294, in _eval
    value = eval(code, self.default_namespace, ns)
  File "<string>", line 1, in <module>
NameError: name 'toc' is not defined at line 15 column 3
__________________________________________________________________

stefanv · 2013-10-28T14:16:21Z

I'll be at a computer in a few hours, then I'll get right back to you.
On 28 Oct 2013 16:15, "Andy R. Terrel" notifications@github.com wrote:

I don't see a make file in the repo. I tried the following which looked to
work in older versions, but to no avail...

$ python publisher/build_html.py papers/
*** Warning: /Users/aterrel/Sites/scipy_proceedings/publisher/_static/institutions.json does not exist.
*** Warning: /Users/aterrel/Sites/scipy_proceedings/publisher/_build/toc.json does not exist.
/bin/sh: recode: command not found
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "publisher/build_html.py", line 29, in
html_from_tmpl(dest_fn+'.html', proc_dict, dest_fn)
File "/Users/aterrel/Sites/scipy_proceedings/publisher/build_template.py", line 42, in html_from_tmpl
content = _from_template(src, config)
File "/Users/aterrel/Sites/scipy_proceedings/publisher/build_template.py", line 14, in _from_template
return template.substitute(config)
File "/Users/aterrel/Sites/scipy_proceedings/publisher/tempita/init.py", line 173, in substitute
result, defs, inherit = self._interpret(ns)
File "/Users/aterrel/Sites/scipy_proceedings/publisher/tempita/init.py", line 184, in _interpret
self._interpret_codes(self._parsed, ns, out=parts, defs=defs)
File "/Users/aterrel/Sites/scipy_proceedings/publisher/tempita/init.py", line 212, in _interpret_codes
self._interpret_code(item, ns, out, defs)
File "/Users/aterrel/Sites/scipy_proceedings/publisher/tempita/init.py", line 225, in _interpret_code
expr = self._eval(expr, ns, pos)
File "/Users/aterrel/Sites/scipy_proceedings/publisher/tempita/init.py", line 294, in _eval
value = eval(code, self.default_namespace, ns)
File "", line 1, in
NameError: name 'toc' is not defined at line 15 column 3

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/70#issuecomment-27214631
.

stefanv · 2013-10-29T10:53:39Z

In the publisher directory, there is a Makefile with a proceedings-html
target.

You need to have pdfannotextractor installed in order to generate the page
numbers.

aterrel · 2013-11-20T16:18:07Z

done.

http://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/scipy2013/

jaberg · 2013-11-20T16:20:31Z

Awesome, site looks great!

gabraganca · 2013-11-20T16:28:40Z

Hi, mine is not there. Did I missed some deadline?

stefanv · 2013-11-20T16:38:25Z

@gabraganca This is for the proceedings--i.e. submitted papers.

gabraganca · 2013-11-20T16:39:36Z

Ok. And I have submitted one. @katyhuff even help me fixing some typos. I am trying to find the PR or the commit...

katyhuff · 2013-11-20T16:40:15Z

He submitted a paper:
#54
But closed the pull request before it was pulled?

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Stefan van der Walt <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

@gabraganca https://github.com/gabraganca This is for the
proceedings--i.e. submitted papers.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/70#issuecomment-28905103
.

http://katyhuff.github.com

katyhuff · 2013-11-20T16:42:11Z

Above.
It was on time.
#54

Gustavo, it appears you closed the pull request before it was pulled into
the repository. I suspect that's why it never made it in.

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Gustavo Bragança
notifications@github.comwrote:

Ok. And I have submitted one. @katyhuff https://github.com/katyhuffeven help me fixing some typos. I am trying to find the PR or the commit...

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/70#issuecomment-28905197
.

http://katyhuff.github.com

stefanv · 2013-11-20T16:44:18Z

Ouch. Under these circumstances, I am willing to rebuild the proceedings if @katyhuff and @aterrel give the thumbs-up and go-ahead.

katyhuff · 2013-11-20T16:47:08Z

Thumbs up. Thanks @stefanv !
@Gustavo , I'm personally very sorry we didn't catch this earlier. Thanks
for letting us know about the mix up!

On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Stefan van der Walt <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

Ouch. Under these circumstances, I am willing to rebuild the proceedings
if @katyhuff https://github.com/katyhuff and @aterrelhttps://github.com/aterrelgive the thumbs-up and go-ahead.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/70#issuecomment-28905624
.

http://katyhuff.github.com

stefanv · 2013-11-20T16:48:18Z

@gabraganca Thou shalt not touch the close button :)

stefanv · 2013-11-20T17:06:24Z

@aterrel New version of the proceedings in Dropbox

leouieda · 2013-11-20T17:21:35Z

Looks great! Thank you for the hard work

gabraganca · 2013-11-20T18:07:18Z

Sorry for the trouble, guys. It seems that the problem was my yearly ignorance on how to contribute on GitHub projects. I thin that the SciPy proceedings was the first time I did a PR.

Thank you very much. 😄

aterrel · 2013-11-21T17:55:23Z

@stefanv I downloaded from the dropbox link again but didn't see any changes. Perhaps the folder link is an older version. Can you send the link again? Sorry but I won't be able to upload it until tomorrow. I'm traveling and on spotty wifi as is.

stefanv · 2013-11-21T20:59:17Z

Thanks, Andy: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4rbl3j1qwudqrw4/ecl1dpo6lM

gabraganca · 2014-01-05T22:28:22Z

Hi, guys! Happy new year!

Any news with about the recompiled new proceedings?

aterrel · 2014-01-06T15:18:31Z

@stefanv I uploaded the files you put in the dropbox link above but it looks like @gabraganca was not included. Can you send an updated version?

stefanv · 2014-01-14T16:03:50Z

@aterrel Sorry, I copied the results into the "html" directory by accident. Just replace the whole directory with the contents of the "html" sub-directory. @gabraganca 's paper is in there, I checked:

http://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/scipy2013/html/

aterrel · 2014-01-14T19:51:58Z

cool I'll get it up tomorrow. traveling now.

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Stefan van der Walt <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

@aterrel https://github.com/aterrel Sorry, I copied the results into
the "html" directory by accident. Just replace the whole directory with the
contents of the "html" sub-directory. @gabragancahttps://github.com/gabraganca's paper is in there, I checked:

http://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/scipy2013/html/

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/70#issuecomment-32277677
.

aterrel · 2014-01-17T22:02:36Z

k this is up:
http://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/scipy2013/braganca.html

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Andy Ray Terrel andy.terrel@gmail.comwrote:

cool I'll get it up tomorrow. traveling now.

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Stefan van der Walt <
notifications@github.com> wrote:

@aterrel https://github.com/aterrel Sorry, I copied the results into
the "html" directory by accident. Just replace the whole directory with the
contents of the "html" sub-directory. @gabragancahttps://github.com/gabraganca's paper is in there, I checked:

http://conference.scipy.org/proceedings/scipy2013/html/

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/70#issuecomment-32277677
.

deniederhut · 2020-01-16T01:37:05Z

Hi everyone! It looks to me like this issue has been resolved. Does anyone object to closing this ticket?

ev-br closed this as completed Oct 10, 2013

ev-br reopened this Oct 10, 2013

aterrel closed this as completed Nov 20, 2013

aterrel reopened this Jan 6, 2014

deniederhut closed this as completed Apr 17, 2020

Add link to published proceedings #70

Add link to published proceedings #70

Comments

jaberg commented Jul 9, 2013

scopatz commented Jul 9, 2013

jaberg commented Jul 9, 2013

scopatz commented Jul 9, 2013

jaberg commented Jul 9, 2013

scopatz commented Jul 9, 2013

stefanv commented Jul 9, 2013

jaberg commented Jul 20, 2013

jaberg commented Jul 20, 2013

pedrohasselmann commented Oct 10, 2013

stefanv commented Oct 10, 2013

aterrel commented Oct 10, 2013

aterrel commented Oct 10, 2013

jaberg commented Oct 10, 2013

aterrel commented Oct 10, 2013

ev-br commented Oct 10, 2013

aterrel commented Oct 10, 2013

jaberg commented Oct 10, 2013

aterrel commented Oct 10, 2013

katyhuff commented Oct 10, 2013

stefanv commented Oct 11, 2013

aterrel commented Oct 13, 2013

katyhuff commented Oct 14, 2013

stefanv commented Oct 14, 2013

aterrel commented Oct 28, 2013

stefanv commented Oct 28, 2013

aterrel commented Oct 28, 2013

stefanv commented Oct 28, 2013

stefanv commented Oct 29, 2013

aterrel commented Nov 20, 2013

jaberg commented Nov 20, 2013

gabraganca commented Nov 20, 2013

stefanv commented Nov 20, 2013

gabraganca commented Nov 20, 2013

katyhuff commented Nov 20, 2013

katyhuff commented Nov 20, 2013

stefanv commented Nov 20, 2013

katyhuff commented Nov 20, 2013

stefanv commented Nov 20, 2013

stefanv commented Nov 20, 2013

leouieda commented Nov 20, 2013

gabraganca commented Nov 20, 2013

aterrel commented Nov 21, 2013

stefanv commented Nov 21, 2013

gabraganca commented Jan 5, 2014

aterrel commented Jan 6, 2014

stefanv commented Jan 14, 2014

aterrel commented Jan 14, 2014

aterrel commented Jan 17, 2014

deniederhut commented Jan 16, 2020