You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm not sure if such lines conform to bibtex syntax, but they are found in standard packages. See, for example, IEEEabrv.bib.
Some minimal examples:
@STRING{Foo = "bar"}
This is a comment
This is a second comment.
This returns the incorrect dictionary entry OrderedDict([('foo', 'bar"} This is a comment This is a second comment.')])
@STRING{Foo = "bar"}
This is a comment
STRING{Baz = "This should be interpreted as comment."}
This raises an exception when parsed.
I had a quick look at the parser code. Maybe, instead of using a new @ line as the record delimiter, it should use the braces?
As a workaround, I'm removing all lines not starting with @ before parsing the aforementioned IEEEabrv.bib fil, but this only works because this particular file only has one-liners.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm not sure if such lines conform to bibtex syntax, but they are found in standard packages. See, for example, IEEEabrv.bib.
Some minimal examples:
This returns the incorrect dictionary entry
OrderedDict([('foo', 'bar"} This is a comment This is a second comment.')])
This raises an exception when parsed.
I had a quick look at the parser code. Maybe, instead of using a new
@
line as the record delimiter, it should use the braces?As a workaround, I'm removing all lines not starting with
@
before parsing the aforementioned IEEEabrv.bib fil, but this only works because this particular file only has one-liners.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: