switch from Travis to GH actions

[pawelmhm]

No description provided.

[pawelmhm]

@Gallaecio @ejulio switched from Travis to GH actions, tests passing for 3.6 until 3.9. Having working CI is an essential condition for doing any other work, e.g. on porting to 3.10. Cassettes are working fine in 3.9 but failing in Python 3.10. Need to investigate why tests are failing with cassettes via vcrpy https://github.com/kevin1024/vcrpy there seems to be something with this library. Latest release of vcrpy was in October 2020, I'm not sure how active project is, perhaps we should switch to different library providing similar functionality.

[elacuesta]

Looking good @pawelmhm, thanks.
Can we keep tox.ini just like we have for other projects? (scrapy, parsel, itemadapter come to mind). That way we can handle the msgpack tests (and other checks like flake8/black/pylint) more easily IMHO.
Lastly, it would be good to have a workflow to publish the package to PyPI. I get that the Travis build is not currently working anyway, so I don't think that should be a blocker for this PR.

[pawelmhm]

thanks for review @elacuesta I'll include your feedback in next commit

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #162 (0d4b022) into master (c70137a) will increase coverage by 0.31%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #162      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   93.96%   94.27%   +0.31%     
==========================================
  Files          28       28              
  Lines        1938     1958      +20     
==========================================
+ Hits         1821     1846      +25     
+ Misses        117      112       -5     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
scrapinghub/client/proxy.py	95.71% <100.00%> (ø)
scrapinghub/client/__init__.py	100.00% <0.00%> (ø)
scrapinghub/hubstorage/client.py	98.00% <0.00%> (+0.02%)	⬆️
scrapinghub/legacy.py	98.45% <0.00%> (+0.03%)	⬆️
scrapinghub/hubstorage/resourcetype.py	97.40% <0.00%> (+0.05%)	⬆️
scrapinghub/client/spiders.py	97.61% <0.00%> (+0.05%)	⬆️
scrapinghub/client/frontiers.py	89.25% <0.00%> (+0.46%)	⬆️
scrapinghub/client/jobs.py	86.42% <0.00%> (+0.71%)	⬆️
scrapinghub/hubstorage/collectionsrt.py	86.27% <0.00%> (+1.96%)	⬆️
scrapinghub/client/exceptions.py	84.84% <0.00%> (+3.31%)	⬆️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update d30aced...0d4b022. Read the comment docs.

[pawelmhm]

@elacuesta

• added pypy and python 2.7
• codecov uplodad via github action
• publish yml action (launched on new release in github, I did not run it, it should be tested properly, maybe uploading to test pypy, we can do it on release)
• brought back tox

[pawelmhm]

About PYPI_TOKEN I don't have permissions to create one so we need to wait for @Gallaecio, would be also nice to have token to testpypi to test it first on first release via github.

[elacuesta]

Awesome, many thanks @pawelmhm. The PyPI token was added to the repo secrets some time ago by @Gallaecio, we don't need to worry about it.