New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Lxml formrequest #111
Merged
Merged
Lxml formrequest #111
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
eb47849
Replaced ClientForm-based FormRequest with a lxml-based implementation
LucianU df2e795
Added test case to make sure that ambiguous clickdata is not allowed
LucianU 4be6c22
Removed ClientForm with its patch and tests, and BeautifulSoup
LucianU a0a1a50
do formdata encoding and serialization in one place. refs #111
dangra f13a547
Removed unnecessary iteration of formdata items
LucianU c760cc5
Copied lxml.html._nons to not rely on that module's private interface…
LucianU e4d22cb
reuse form_values() method from lxml to avoid copying code. #111
dangra 32b9f78
lxml form request cleanup. #111
dangra ee1f784
more lxml form fixes and test cases. #111
dangra 2904dc2
no need for MultipleElementsFound exception. #111
dangra 9e10abc
Merge branch 'master' into lxml-formrequest
dangra a11ef7f
reuse LxmlDocument in FormRequest. #111
dangra 51e5aad
simplify formdata type infering. #111
dangra b88bdd0
do not add clickable if it is in formdata. #111
dangra 39395eb
iteritems returns tuple elements duh!. #111
dangra File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I tried removing the call to
_nons()
and still passed all tests.What about removing it completely of figuring out a test case that justifies its use?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1