Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(2980): remote trigger does not work when the job includes other normal join jobs [2] #3008

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 1, 2024

Conversation

yk634
Copy link
Contributor

@yk634 yk634 commented Jan 29, 2024

Context

If a Remote Triggered downstream pipeline was Remote Triggered twice, only one job would be triggered.
Reference: #2980.

Due to this issue, #2964 was reverted.

I would like to change the #2964 again with this issue resolved.

Objective

As mentioned in #2980 (comment), the problem is that the loop would return, so we will fix it so that it triggers all necessary builds without returning.

References

The unit test fails until screwdriver-cd/workflow-parser#49 is published.

License

I confirm that this contribution is made under a BSD license and that I have the authority necessary to make this contribution on behalf of its copyright owner.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 29, 2024

Coverage Status

coverage: 95.044% (+0.09%) from 94.957%
when pulling dbff0dc on sonic-screwdriver-cd:yk634-patch-1
into cb1c6cc on screwdriver-cd:master.

@yk634 yk634 marked this pull request as ready for review January 29, 2024 07:26
@yk634 yk634 changed the title [2] fix(2980): remote trigger does not work when the job includes other normal join jobs fix(2980): remote trigger does not work when the job includes other normal join jobs [2] Jan 29, 2024
@tkyi tkyi merged commit 1d215ec into screwdriver-cd:master Feb 1, 2024
2 checks passed
@yk634 yk634 deleted the yk634-patch-1 branch February 1, 2024 02:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants