feat(contracts): 4844 support

[zimpha]

Purpose or design rationale of this PR

Describe your change. Make sure to answer these three questions: What does this PR do? Why does it do it? How does it do it?

PR title

Your PR title must follow conventional commits (as we are doing squash merge for each PR), so it must start with one of the following types:

• build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: yarn, eslint, typescript)
• ci: Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts (example scopes: vercel, github, cypress)
• docs: Documentation-only changes
• feat: A new feature
• fix: A bug fix
• perf: A code change that improves performance
• refactor: A code change that doesn't fix a bug, or add a feature, or improves performance
• style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc)
• test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests

Deployment tag versioning

Has tag in common/version.go been updated or have you added bump-version label to this PR?

• No, this PR doesn't involve a new deployment, git tag, docker image tag
• Yes

Breaking change label

Does this PR have the breaking-change label?

• No, this PR is not a breaking change
• Yes

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 57.82609% with 97 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 56.40%. Comparing base (02415a6) to head (cccec61).

Files	Patch %	Lines
contracts/src/L1/rollup/ScrollChain.sol	55.80%	80 Missing ⚠️
...ntracts/src/libraries/codec/BatchHeaderV1Codec.sol	47.05%	9 Missing ⚠️
contracts/src/libraries/codec/ChunkCodecV1.sol	0.00%	7 Missing ⚠️
...ntracts/src/libraries/codec/BatchHeaderV0Codec.sol	83.33%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #1179      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    56.79%   56.40%   -0.40%     
===========================================
  Files          155      157       +2     
  Lines        11848    11968     +120     
===========================================
+ Hits          6729     6750      +21     
- Misses        4613     4712      +99     
  Partials       506      506              

Flag	Coverage Δ
common	62.07% <ø> (ø)
contracts	55.25% <57.82%> (-2.29%)	⬇️
coordinator	19.88% <ø> (ø)
database	42.85% <ø> (ø)
rollup	63.56% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[colinlyguo]

Do we need a finalizeBatch4844 (without proof) in Sepolia?

[zimpha]

Do we need a finalizeBatch4844 (without proof) in Sepolia?

we can add one after this PR merged

[Thegaram]

Do we need a finalizeBatch4844 (without proof) in Sepolia?

Fyi I added this on https://github.com/scroll-tech/scroll/tree/feat/4844-skip-proof-for-local-testing for local testing. But eventually we'll need to push this code to the sepolia branch.

[colinlyguo]

Do we need a finalizeBatch4844 (without proof) in Sepolia?

Fyi I added this on https://github.com/scroll-tech/scroll/tree/feat/4844-skip-proof-for-local-testing for local testing. But eventually we'll need to push this code to the sepolia branch.

Cool. FYI, the rollup-relayer has supported and tested finalizeBatch4844 (when timeout, without proof) in your commit, too.