-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
cod-GRvsd1_Gi9qrR-e66475.xml
118 lines (118 loc) · 5.89 KB
/
cod-GRvsd1_Gi9qrR-e66475.xml
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"?><?xml-model href="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng" type="application/xml" schematypens="http://purl.oclc.org/dsdl/schematron"?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title>Dubitationes litterales</title>
<author ref="#GilesOfRome">Giles of Rome</author>
<respStmt>
<name ref="#jeffreycwitt">Jeffrey C. Witt</name>
<resp>Transcription Editor</resp>
<resp>TEI Encoder</resp>
</respStmt>
</titleStmt>
<editionStmt>
<edition n="0.0.0-dev">
<title>Dubitationes litterales</title>
<date when="2021-05-22">May 22, 2021</date>
</edition>
</editionStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<authority>SCTA</authority>
<availability status="free">
<p>Published under a <ref target="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)</ref>
</p>
</availability>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<listWit>
<witness xml:id="C" n="cod-GRvsd1">Cordoba 1699</witness>
</listWit>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<encodingDesc>
<schemaRef n="lbp-diplomatic-1.0.0" url="https://raw.githubusercontent.com/lombardpress/lombardpress-schema/1.0.0/src/out/diplomatic.rng"/>
<editorialDecl>
<p>Encoding of this text has followed the recommendations of the LombardPress 1.0.0
guidelines for a diplomatic edition.</p>
</editorialDecl>
</encodingDesc>
<revisionDesc status="draft">
<listChange>
<change when="2021-05-22" status="draft" n="0.0.0">
<p>Created file for the first time.</p>
</change>
</listChange>
</revisionDesc>
</teiHeader>
<text xml:lang="la">
<front>
<div xml:id="starts-on">
<pb ed="#C" n="247"/>
<cb ed="#C" n="b"/>
</div>
</front>
<body>
<div xml:id="Gi9qrR-e66475"><!-- l1-d12dublit -->
<head xml:id="Gi9qrR-e66475-Hd1e108">Dubitationes litterales</head>
<p xml:id="Gi9qrR-e66475-d1e111">
<lb ed="#C" n="79"/>DVBITATIONES LITTERALES.
</p>
<p xml:id="Gi9qrR-e66475-d1e116">
<lb ed="#C" n="80"/>SVPER litteram super illud: Aut nato
<lb ed="#C" n="81"/>Filio &c. Quaeritur: quare Mag.
<lb ed="#C" n="82"/>nullam partem concedit; sed videtur,
<lb ed="#C" n="83"/>quod debeat eam concedere, cum
na<lb ed="#C" n="84" break="no"/>tum, & non natum opponantur
con<lb ed="#C" n="85" break="no"/>tradictorie. Et dicendum, quod
neu<lb ed="#C" n="86" break="no"/>tram concedit: quia quaelibet est mul
<lb ed="#C" n="87"/>tiplex, nam si nato dicit temporis
prae<lb ed="#C" n="88" break="no"/>teritionem, tunc est falsa, cum ibi non
<lb ed="#C" n="89"/>sint intervalla temporum, & negativa
<lb ed="#C" n="90"/>vera. Sed si nato dicit persectionem, est
<lb ed="#C" n="91"/>affirmativa vera: quia nato Filio, sive
<lb ed="#C" n="92"/>perfecto secundum nativitatem
proce<lb ed="#C" n="93" break="no"/>dit Spiritus, & negativa tunc est falsa,
<lb ed="#C" n="94"/>scilicet, non nato Filio procedit
Spi<lb ed="#C" n="95" break="no"/>ritus.
</p>
<p xml:id="Gi9qrR-e66475-d1e153">
<lb ed="#C" n="96"/>Item non videtur arguere ad
pro<lb ed="#C" n="97" break="no"/>positum: nam quaestio est, utrum
Spi<lb ed="#C" n="98" break="no"/>ritus procedat prius a Patre, quam a
<lb ed="#C" n="99"/>Filio, & ipse arguit, quod Filius prius
<lb ed="#C" n="100"/>procedit a Patre, quam Spiritus. Et
di<lb ed="#C" n="101" break="no"/>cendum, quod eadem veritate negatur
<lb ed="#C" n="102"/>utrumque: quia utrumque repugnat
<lb ed="#C" n="103"/>aeternitati, ideo si unum conceditur,
<lb ed="#C" n="104"/>conceditur aliud, & si negatur, negatur
<lb ed="#C" n="105"/>aliud. Item notandum est, quod aliud
<lb ed="#C" n="106"/>est procedere plenius, aliud magis: quia
<lb ed="#C" n="107"/>plenius procedit, quod plura accipit a
<lb ed="#C" n="108"/>principio. Magis, quod a maiori
vir<lb ed="#C" n="109" break="no"/>tute procedit. Spiritus Sanctus non
plu<lb ed="#C" n="110" break="no"/>ra accipit a Patre, quam a Filio, nec a
<!--285.xml-->
<pb ed="#C" n="248"/>
<cb ed="#C" n="a"/>
<lb ed="#C" n="1"/>matiori virture procedtit, cum
proce<lb ed="#C" n="2" break="no"/>dit a Patre, quam a Filio, cum eademi
<lb ed="#C" n="3"/>sit cirtus utriusque: ideo neque
ple<lb ed="#C" n="4" break="no"/>rtius, neque magis procedit ab uno, quam
<lb ed="#C" n="5"/>ab. alio.
</p>
<p xml:id="Gi9qrR-e66475-d1e205">
<lb ed="#C" n="6"/>aitem dicitur Spiritum Sanctum
pro<lb ed="#C" n="7" break="no"/>cedtere a Patre, principaliter. Contra:
<!--285.xml-->
<cb ed="#C" n="b"/>
<lb ed="#C" n="8"/>quia procederet a Filio secundario.
Di<lb ed="#C" n="9" break="no"/>cendum, quod ibi principaliter nom
<lb ed="#C" n="10"/>dicit gradum virtutis; sed ordinem
oni<lb ed="#C" n="11" break="no"/>ginis; prooedene autem secundaumo
<lb ed="#C" n="12"/>est procedere secundum minntem:
vir<lb ed="#C" n="13" break="no"/>tutem.
</p>
</div>
</body>
</text>
</TEI>