You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've written this a few times in the past, but I can't say this often enough: Thank you for sharing your excellent analysis software with the community!
I'm writing to inquire about the possibility of exposing the labels_key in the totalVI model.
My reason for coveting this feature is the following: I have CITE-seq data from cells for which I have some a priori information on coarse cell type, i.e. my libraries consist of two different cell types that I've sorted (via FACS) and labeled with hash tag olives before multiplexing them into a single library.
[Perhaps anecdotally] I notice that when I integrate several of these libraries via scVI, using batch and label keys, the boundary between the two cell types remain crisp. When I try this with totalVI, using batch key [and the additional CITE-seq data] there is more mixing between the [closely related] cell types.
Thanks in advance for considering this request.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I second @StefanMDPhD! Thank you for the effort you put in this excellent package.
Exposing labels_key in totalVI is a highly desired feature on my end as well. I hope it's a simple enough addition.
I too noticed that cell-type-aware-embedding clusters much better compared with using batch keys alone.
I've written this a few times in the past, but I can't say this often enough: Thank you for sharing your excellent analysis software with the community!
I'm writing to inquire about the possibility of exposing the labels_key in the totalVI model.
My reason for coveting this feature is the following: I have CITE-seq data from cells for which I have some a priori information on coarse cell type, i.e. my libraries consist of two different cell types that I've sorted (via FACS) and labeled with hash tag olives before multiplexing them into a single library.
[Perhaps anecdotally] I notice that when I integrate several of these libraries via scVI, using batch and label keys, the boundary between the two cell types remain crisp. When I try this with totalVI, using batch key [and the additional CITE-seq data] there is more mixing between the [closely related] cell types.
Thanks in advance for considering this request.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: