You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Note that DynamoDB also has the opposite feature, "Export to S3", announced two years earlier - see #8789.
Although users can do the same thing in their own code, apparently DynamoDB users welcomed the convenience of the database doing this for them. This is similar to how TTL support was added to DynamoDB after users have been doing the same thing with external processes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In August 2022, DynamoDB added a "S3 Import" feature, which we don't yet
support - so let's document this missing feature in the compatibility
document.
Refs scylladb#11739.
Signed-off-by: Nadav Har'El <nyh@scylladb.com>
In August 2022, DynamoDB added a "S3 Import" feature, which we don't yet
support - so let's document this missing feature in the compatibility
document.
Refs #11739.
Signed-off-by: Nadav Har'El <nyh@scylladb.com>
Closes#11740
As announced in August 2022, DynamoDB recently got new operations for filling a new table from content stored on S3:
ImportTable
,DescribeImport
, andListImports
.For more information see:
Note that DynamoDB also has the opposite feature, "Export to S3", announced two years earlier - see #8789.
Although users can do the same thing in their own code, apparently DynamoDB users welcomed the convenience of the database doing this for them. This is similar to how TTL support was added to DynamoDB after users have been doing the same thing with external processes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: