Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FeatureCount output #322

Closed
Shinichiro03 opened this issue Jun 22, 2022 · 6 comments
Closed

FeatureCount output #322

Shinichiro03 opened this issue Jun 22, 2022 · 6 comments

Comments

@Shinichiro03
Copy link

I run example data.
In my output directory, I can *.filtered.Aligned.GeneTagged.sorted.bam, but without any featureCounts.bam such as *.aligned.sorted.bam.featureCounts *.ex.featureCounts and *.in.featureCounts.
I saw those files in /.temp directory, and can not see any error in the terminal.

Could you please tell me how to solve this issue?
Really appreciate any of your suggestions and help.
Best,
Shin

@cziegenhain
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi Shin,

That is expected, the final GeneTagged bam file contains both the exon and intron gene information derived from featureCounts:

https://github.com/sdparekh/zUMIs/wiki/Output#explanation-of-the-bam-tags-zumis-uses

Best,
Christoph

@Shinichiro03
Copy link
Author

Hi Christoph,

Thank you for your reply.
Should I use *.filtered.Aligned.GeneTagged.sorted.bam for running ss3iso?
This is because ss3iso option part mention that "Use '*filtered.tagged.Aligned.out.bam.ex.featureCounts.UBfix.sort.bam' generated by zUMIs. Every read should have a UB:Z tag.”

Best,
Shin

@cziegenhain
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi Shin,

yes this is the appropriate bam file.
since it seems this is smartseq3 data, I do strongly recommend to use the UMI error correction in zUMIs.
In case of issues or doubt with other scripts like ss3iso please refer to those GitHub repositories.

Best
Christoph

@Shinichiro03
Copy link
Author

Hi Christoph,

Thank you very much for your help!

Best,
Shin

@Shinichiro03
Copy link
Author

Shinichiro03 commented Oct 11, 2022 via email

@cziegenhain
Copy link
Collaborator

Sounds correct, yes!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants