-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Initial release #1
Conversation
7ad04d7
to
c7a8be7
Compare
|
||
MINIMUM_COVERAGE = 100 | ||
|
||
unless ENV['COVERAGE'] == 'off' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. sealink/timely@4109534
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Addressed @mnoack thanks!
Changes Unknown when pulling 8bdac29 on extraction_from_quicktravel into ** on master**. |
Changes Unknown when pulling 36291d4 on extraction_from_quicktravel into ** on master**. |
36291d4
to
8bdac29
Compare
I have some suggestions for review set up as a pr here: #3 |
This allows an EnvParser to mask iteslf which reduces object instantiations and simplifies the abstraction. As a result ParameterMasker has been removed and EnvParser now calls SensitiveDataFilter::Mask.mask_hash directly. Minor improvements to consistency of using parentheses.
PrameterScanner.new is immediately followed by a call to sensitive_data? meaning there is no reason to lazy-load the scans. They’re now just done on initialize.
Abstraction can be reduced resulting in a clear definition of the objects concern during initialization.
Changes Unknown when pulling b4d3f7c on extraction_from_quicktravel into ** on master**. |
Changes Unknown when pulling d0249eb on extraction_from_quicktravel into ** on master**. |
Extracted from QuickTravel