Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace unmaintained/outdated github actions #1020

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 20, 2023
Merged

Replace unmaintained/outdated github actions #1020

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 20, 2023

Conversation

nickelc
Copy link
Contributor

@nickelc nickelc commented Jan 30, 2023

The toolchain is now installed with dtolnay/rust-toolchain.

The toolchain is now installed with `dtolnay/rust-toolchain`.
@jxs
Copy link
Collaborator

jxs commented Feb 6, 2023

Hi, and thanks for this!
Interesting, it seems rust 1.66 broke warp's impl Reply on return types. Opened rust-lang/rust#107729 CC @seanmonstar

@seanmonstar
Copy link
Owner

I think we can solve this by changing the types to (impl Reply,).

brotskydotcom added a commit to brotskydotcom/warp that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2023
This fixes the new compiler warning about implicit associated type bounds, as per seanmonstar#1020 (comment)
clickonetwo added a commit to clickonetwo/adobe-desktop-licensing-utilities that referenced this pull request Feb 18, 2023
1. Don't take references of Strings unless their needed.
2. Use explicit tuple with Extract = impl Reply type, as per seanmonstar/warp#1020 (comment), to avoid warnings about implicit attributed bounds.
@SylvainGarrigues
Copy link

I think we can solve this by changing the types to (impl Reply,).

This indeed makes the warp examples compile. Any plans to merge these modifications?

@jxs
Copy link
Collaborator

jxs commented Mar 19, 2023

I think we can solve this by changing the types to (impl Reply,).

This indeed makes the warp examples compile. Any plans to merge these modifications?

would you like to submit a PR addressing that? :)

baum added a commit to baum/warp that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2023
baum added a commit to baum/warp that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2023
seanmonstar pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 20, 2023
- Per Sean McArthur's suggestion here - #1020 (comment)
- Fixes #1015
Copy link
Owner

@seanmonstar seanmonstar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

@seanmonstar seanmonstar merged commit 99bd129 into seanmonstar:master Mar 20, 2023
@nickelc nickelc deleted the ci-actions branch March 20, 2023 15:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants