added annotation as method is part of dynamic rule

[kuimovvg]

What do you think about slightly changing the approach to declaring and creating dynamic rules?

[kuimovvg]

rule is like

public class TestDynamicRule extends JRule {
    public TestDynamicRule() {
        super(false);
    }
    @JRuleName(value = "MyDynamichRule", isDynamic = true)
    @JRuleWhenItemChange(item = MyTestSwitch, to = "OFF", from = "ON")
    public void execOffToOnRule() {
        logInfo("||||| --> Ya");
    }
}

and creation is like

TestDynamicRule rule = new TestDynamicRule();
Method method = rule.getClass().getMethods()[0];
JRuleEngine.get().addDynamic(method, rule);

[seaside1]

I think that would work. I will test it out shortly.

[seaside1]

The problem I see with this is that the annotations makes it not be fully dynamic. If you look at the implementation I made for the sonos-jrule, I have dynamic trigger for items as well. I think we could add this but it should not replace the existing dynamic load.

[kuimovvg]

I agree, he is also needed. Inattentively I looked at the functionality from sonos-jrule. Return the addDynamicWhenReceivedCommand method in my PR?

[seaside1]

@kuimovvg Sorry for being absent. Worklife has been hectic lately. I would like to merge the original dynamic rules PR first, and then test this out.