further changes to make zipper compatible for additional systems #8
Conversation
|
Hey there... well.. i not sure about this. Do you know other people that might benefit from this? Someone interested on the library that cannot use c++11 yet? I kinda like the simplicity that c++11 offered to make the code smaller, clearer and elegant so to speak. I'll leave this open a couple of days. |
|
Like I said before I'm not sure either the feedback I received so far is that the dependency on the c++17 STL or boost would be too cumbersome. So I might have to even reimplement the filesystem bits in plain c.i can understand if that is not the direction you want to take this. |
… as used in COPASI - moved tools functions into zipper namespace - moved changeFileDate to unzipper
|
Hey there, im back a little late, but finally back. It looks like theres a conflict with the tools source? |
|
so what changed between now and then, was that i removed all the dependency on the different file system api's in favor of taking the one from our project, where we encapsulated everything before. I think starting from my version and using your it should work fine again |
I'm not actually sure you want to merge this back, but i thought i let you know. I needed the api to compile on systems that are not yet capable of running c++11. In any case, please have a look and see what works for you.