New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ES2020 BigInt #1027
Merged
Merged
ES2020 BigInt #1027
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lahma
force-pushed
the
bigint
branch
2 times, most recently
from
December 13, 2021 19:18
5263b35
to
0b8ad1d
Compare
I think I still need to validate against latest test suite and bigint related tests. |
All bigint related tests pass in my custom workbench after two latest commits, still requires new Esprima release for full compatibility. |
sebastienros
approved these changes
Dec 20, 2021
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
BigInt
folderBigInt
primitive typeJsValue.Equals
(===, strict) andJsValue.LooseEquals
(==)There might be things to improve, but I think some refactoring can be left later. I'm probably going to try separate operator overloading via decorators or something to make core logic more concise.