Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

automatic tags #152

Open
tolima opened this issue Dec 1, 2013 · 3 comments
Open

automatic tags #152

tolima opened this issue Dec 1, 2013 · 3 comments

Comments

@tolima
Copy link

tolima commented Dec 1, 2013

automaticly add a tag if the sharp # character is in the text (as in twitter, seenthis etc)

@Sbgodin
Copy link
Contributor

Sbgodin commented Dec 1, 2013

The user would still have the ability to validate the tag list or not. This way, a first click on "submit" would set up the tag list, a second click will validate all this. If the description is modified, the user would have to click twice again.

@sijnak
Copy link

sijnak commented Dec 1, 2013

The idea is nice but I would suggest that this is exclusive with the
conventional tag list because it would introduce a coupling between two
fields in the form. Furthermore, needing to make two clicks is boring
for me :)

Le 01/12/2013 17:07, Sbgodin a écrit :

The user would still have the ability to validate the tag list or not.
This way, a first click on "submit" would set up the tag list, a
second click will validate all this. If the description is modified,
the user would have to click twice again.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#152 (comment).

@tolima
Copy link
Author

tolima commented Dec 2, 2013

I'm not sure to understand the problem but here is how I see it :
when you press # it work like on github comments : a tooltip appear with the possible tag (like on shaarli in the tag fields) + the one you are writing.
If you just press space, nothing particular append. But if you select one tag and press enter, the tag you're writing is completed and added to the tag list. You can continue your edition.
Do you think it's good ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants