Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

More obvious difference between BTC and STX/FT transactions #56

Closed
QUDBS opened this issue Nov 14, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #227
Closed

More obvious difference between BTC and STX/FT transactions #56

QUDBS opened this issue Nov 14, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #227
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@QUDBS
Copy link

QUDBS commented Nov 14, 2022

Story

As a User
I want to see with a quick look if I'm on a BTC or STX or FT transaction screen

@QUDBS QUDBS added enhancement New feature or request design labels Nov 14, 2022
@QUDBS QUDBS self-assigned this Nov 14, 2022
@QUDBS QUDBS added this to the Sprint 21 - Nov 28 milestone Nov 14, 2022
@QUDBS
Copy link
Author

QUDBS commented Dec 12, 2022

@yknl yknl unassigned QUDBS Jan 16, 2023
@yknl yknl removed the design label Jan 17, 2023
@Imamah-Zafar Imamah-Zafar linked a pull request Feb 2, 2023 that will close this issue
8 tasks
@yknl yknl closed this as completed in #227 Feb 16, 2023
teebszet pushed a commit that referenced this issue Nov 29, 2023
…SatsAPIResponseToRareSatsV2 method to map the response for v2 api (#56)

* chore: add mock data and local storage values for testing and mapRareSatsAPIResponseToRareSatsV2 method to map the response for v2 api

* chore: add localstorage value to use prod api

* feat: rare sats tab UI (#57)

* feat: rare sats tab UI

* fix: gallery view UI

* fix: icons

* fix: thousand separator

---------

Co-authored-by: Abdul Haseeb <haseeb4239@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants