Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Detect invalid brc20 tokens #455

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jun 20, 2023

Conversation

dhriaznov
Copy link
Contributor

@dhriaznov dhriaznov commented Jun 2, 2023

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Enhancement
  • Code style update (formatting, local variables)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build related changes
  • CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other... Please describe:

What is the current behavior?

(Optional) Resolved: #Insert issue number

What is the new behavior?

A check for brc20 inscriptions validates that the json text inside the ordinal is valid json before showing the brc20 tile otherwise it should be shown as normal text inscription

Screenshot / Video

@dhriaznov dhriaznov added enhancement New feature or request ui labels Jun 2, 2023
@dhriaznov dhriaznov added this to the Sprint 34 - June 5 milestone Jun 2, 2023
@dhriaznov dhriaznov self-assigned this Jun 2, 2023
@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Jun 2, 2023

ENG-2207 Detect invalid brc20 tokens

a check for brc20 inscriptions should validate that the json text inside the ordinal is valid json before showing the brc20 tile otherwise it should be shown as normal text inscription

@dhriaznov dhriaznov marked this pull request as ready for review June 2, 2023 19:23
Imamah-Zafar
Imamah-Zafar previously approved these changes Jun 5, 2023
@DuskaT021
Copy link
Contributor

tested 👍

@DuskaT021 DuskaT021 merged commit 9854e33 into develop Jun 20, 2023
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request ui
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants