Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test multi python versions #59

Conversation

vladimir-v-diaz
Copy link
Contributor

@vladimir-v-diaz vladimir-v-diaz commented Sep 18, 2017

securesystemslib officially supports Python 2.7, 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, and 3.6.

It appears that we cannot currently run CI tests under Python 3.3 (interpreter not found) and Python 3.5 due to issues with Travis. For now, this pull request ensures testing under Python versions 2.7, 3.4, and 3.6.

We should enable testing under Python 3.5 and possibly 3.3 (it is nearing its End of Life) once Travis resolves the current problems with Python interpreters.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling fd609d4 on vladimir-v-diaz:test_multi_python_versions into b8c047d on secure-systems-lab:master.

1 similar comment
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Sep 19, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 100.0% when pulling fd609d4 on vladimir-v-diaz:test_multi_python_versions into b8c047d on secure-systems-lab:master.

@vladimir-v-diaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

I updated the pull request summary to note the inability to test under Python 3.3 and 3.5 due to issues with Travis at the moment. For now, we run Travis-ci tests for Python 2.7, 3.4, and 3.6.

@baloian
Copy link

baloian commented Oct 24, 2017

Do you have an open issues for Python 3.3 and 3.5 support once Travis solves it's issue ?
Open an issue if you think it makes sense.

@vladimir-v-diaz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Great point. I will open an issue so that we can keep track of it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants