Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[SCB-Bot] Upgraded nuclei from v2.7.1 to v2.7.2 #1212

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 8, 2022
Merged

[SCB-Bot] Upgraded nuclei from v2.7.1 to v2.7.2 #1212

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 8, 2022

Conversation

secureCodeBoxBot
Copy link
Contributor

This is an automated Pull Request by the SCB-Bot. It upgrades nuclei from v2.7.1 to v2.7.2

Release changes : here

@secureCodeBoxBot
Upgrading nuclei from v2.7.1 to v2.7.2
049f8cc 
Signed-off-by: secureCodeBoxBot <securecodebox@iteratec.com>
@secureCodeBoxBot secureCodeBoxBot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file scanner Implement or update a security scanner labels Jun 8, 2022
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 8, 2022 •
edited

MegaLinter status: ✅ SUCCESS

Descriptor Linter Files Fixed Errors Elapsed time
✅ GIT git_diff yes no 0.09s
✅ SPELL misspell 1 0 0.05s
✅ YAML prettier 1 0 0.88s
✅ YAML v8r 1 0 2.2s
✅ YAML yamllint 1 0 0.15s

See errors details in artifact MegaLinter reports on CI Job page
Set VALIDATE_ALL_CODEBASE: true in mega-linter.yml to validate all sources, not only the diff

@J12934 J12934 merged commit fe080e2 into main Jun 8, 2022
@J12934 J12934 deleted the dependencies/upgrading-nuclei-to-v2.7.2 branch June 8, 2022 11:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@J12934 J12934 J12934 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file scanner Implement or update a security scanner
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@secureCodeBoxBot @J12934