Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Doc improvements #785

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Doc improvements #785

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

PhiLhoSoft
Copy link
Contributor

@PhiLhoSoft
Doc improvements
944f587 
- Some typo fixes
- Fixes selectize#779, selectize#745, selectize#464 and perhaps some others
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 83.19% when pulling 944f587 on PhiLhoSoft:PLS-DocImprovements into 3dc07d4 on brianreavis:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 83.19% when pulling f710715 on PhiLhoSoft:PLS-DocImprovements into 3dc07d4 on brianreavis:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 83.19% when pulling f10ac15 on PhiLhoSoft:PLS-DocImprovements into 3dc07d4 on brianreavis:master.

@joallard
Copy link
Member

joallard commented Jul 6, 2016

Rebased the pr as branch pr-785. Would you check if everything looks okay?

@joallard joallard mentioned this pull request Jul 6, 2016
Closed
@micahblu
Copy link

micahblu commented Jul 6, 2016

👍

@joallard joallard closed this in 0ab6205 Jul 20, 2016
bwilson-ux pushed a commit to bwilson-ux/selectize.js that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2016
@PhiLhoSoft @ss-agent-marine-scotland
Docs: Improvements
1d28db5 
Closes selectize#785 [skip-ci]

- Some typo fixes
- Fixes selectize#779, selectize#745, selectize#464 and perhaps some others

(Markdown doesn't work inside tables :-( )
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

How is the options object array expected to formatted?
4 participants
@PhiLhoSoft @coveralls @joallard @micahblu