Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add option not to add timestamp to URLs #4

Closed
angryziber opened this issue Apr 26, 2012 · 1 comment
Closed

Add option not to add timestamp to URLs #4

angryziber opened this issue Apr 26, 2012 · 1 comment

Comments

@angryziber
Copy link
Contributor

Or maybe add only for IE?
Need to investigate why it is needed at all.
@asolntsev
Copy link
Member

Added timestamp only for IE

asolntsev pushed a commit that referenced this issue May 18, 2017
Merge pull request #4 from codeborne/master
6576566 
Update to last version of selenide's code
asolntsev added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 3, 2022
@asolntsev
increase pauses to fix flaky test
f0e13fe 
otherwise we sometimes get a failing test:

```
CollectionWithChangingTextsTest > stream() FAILED
    java.lang.AssertionError:
    Expecting actual:
      ["Item #1",
        "Updated Item #2",
        "Updated Item #3",
        "Additional text #4",
        "Additional text #5"]
    to contain exactly (and in same order):
      ["Item #1", "Item #2", "Item #3"]
    but some elements were not found:
      ["Item #2", "Item #3"]
    and others were not expected:
      ["Updated Item #2",
        "Updated Item #3",
        "Additional text #4",
        "Additional text #5"]
        at integration.CollectionWithChangingTextsTest.stream(CollectionWithChangingTextsTest.java:62)
```
asolntsev added a commit that referenced this issue May 23, 2023
@asolntsev
#4 Support local browsers too
d6894be
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@asolntsev @angryziber