We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Describe the bug When writing a Ruby rule, Semgrep returns a false negative on method calls with no parameters. (link to Slack discussion: https://r2c-community.slack.com/archives/C018NJRRCJ0/p1630341006011600)
To Reproduce https://semgrep.dev/s/brbQ
Expected behavior A parameter-less call should be able to be matched.
Screenshots
What is the priority of the bug to you?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue is synced in Linear at https://linear.app/r2c/issue/SUP-35/ruby-rules-dont-match-parameter-less-calls.
Sorry, something went wrong.
[Ruby] treat 'foo' as an hidden function call
cba63c3
This closes #3811 test plan: test file included
[Ruby] treat 'foo' as an hidden function call (#3951)
714afec
* [Ruby] treat 'foo' as an hidden function call This closes #3811 test plan: test file included * changelog
aryx
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Describe the bug
When writing a Ruby rule, Semgrep returns a false negative on method calls with no parameters.
(link to Slack discussion: https://r2c-community.slack.com/archives/C018NJRRCJ0/p1630341006011600)
To Reproduce
https://semgrep.dev/s/brbQ
Expected behavior
A parameter-less call should be able to be matched.
Screenshots
What is the priority of the bug to you?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: