-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 143
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Traceback on batch book view #366
Comments
still a problem with senaite 1.1.6 |
Produces an ugly traceback and therefore set to high priority |
Maybe related to bikalims/bika.lims#2063 |
@ramonski not really. I just did a test with a single AR with the same error. |
I have tested with 5 ARs containing every analysis service present in the pre-configured test data. In all states up to and including 'Published', I cannot cause this error to appear. I'll need help to reproduce. In the meanwhile, please try clearing your browser's cookies for the LIMS site, this may help. |
Just checking this one @rockfruit and fall over this issue:
Shall I add a new issue for that? |
Another issue re. Batchbooks:
Seems like this fails depending on the values in the content |
Looks to me like the |
Yes that is what I see too, and I cannot reproduce it. Are you able to reproduce this locally on your machine? If so, I'd like to have a conversation with you. |
@ramonski the two tracebacks seem to be related, so this one issue is a good home for both of them. But without being able to put a debugger in there, there isn't really enough information in the traces for me to be sure that I fix this correctly. It does not appear to be the kind of error I'd expect to cause an "intermittent" exception! |
ok, skip that one until next week. We'll talk than anyway and probably fix it together then. |
Issue still appears :(
|
This one as well:
|
Ok, also the latest upgrade step fails for this installation, which seem to be related to the second Traceback, but not to the one with the encoding:
|
Didn't encounter this issue again with version 1.2.9 |
Ok, it seems to me also like an issue with the data rather than with the code. Please re-open if the issue occurs with new Batches in 1.3.0 @grulisco |
Steps to reproduce
Current behavior
Does not work, see
Expected behavior
batch results table should be displayed
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: