Drop usage of portal_catalog tool #2368
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description of the issue/feature this PR addresses
☝️ NOTE: Please merge #2367 first!
This PR removes all remaining references where catalog searches were performed by
portal_catalogFurthermore, this PR patches the
PortalCatalogProcessorutility to avoid indexing of all contents inportal_catalog. This improves the performance done in #2359 furtherCurrent behavior before PR
portal_catalogtool was used in several placesDesired behavior after PR is merged
Use either one of the special catalogs or fall back to use
uid_catalog--
I confirm I have tested this PR thoroughly and coded it according to PEP8
and Plone's Python styleguide standards.