Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request prepend-https #11

Closed
0xtavian opened this issue Oct 4, 2018 · 6 comments
Closed

Feature Request prepend-https #11

0xtavian opened this issue Oct 4, 2018 · 6 comments

Comments

@0xtavian
Copy link

0xtavian commented Oct 4, 2018

gowitness should have the option of prepending http/s like eyewitness does.

@leonjza
Copy link
Member

leonjza commented Oct 4, 2018

Which sub command are you referring to? scan has the --no-http and --no-https flags as it prepends by default. file takes URLs from a file you provide so it didn't make sense to add it there and single is a URL you provide, so it also did not make sense to me there.

@0xtavian
Copy link
Author

0xtavian commented Oct 4, 2018

Im referring to the sub command file. prepending http + https to every request is preferable when dealing with any list consisting of IP:PORT. Its easy to export IP:PORT from other tools but prepending http/s is essential when taking screen shots.

@leonjza
Copy link
Member

leonjza commented Oct 4, 2018

Makes sense! At the moment the file sub command assumes URL's are provided. Will tag this as an enhancement. In the interim I guess one can generate a quick list with some bash one-liners.

@0xtavian
Copy link
Author

0xtavian commented Oct 4, 2018

Right! With Eyewitness they have a --prepend-https flag that prepends http+https to every request so it makes it simple! Granted, with that feature in this circumstance you have to deal with 50%+ pages possibly being errors but IMO its worth it!!!

@0xtavian
Copy link
Author

0xtavian commented Oct 4, 2018

Dont get me wrong, i love the way you guys deal with errors! so u might as well prepend http and https to every request!

@0xtavian
Copy link
Author

0xtavian commented Oct 4, 2018

and then sort, like what was mentioned here #12
ok /end rant.

thanks guys!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants