Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2.0 statsd documentation features an incorrect example #406

Closed
1 task done
echlebek opened this issue May 7, 2018 · 2 comments · Fixed by #782
Closed
1 task done

2.0 statsd documentation features an incorrect example #406

echlebek opened this issue May 7, 2018 · 2 comments · Fixed by #782
Assignees
Labels
errata Error in documentation good first issue Suitable for a new contributor to resolve
Milestone

Comments

@echlebek
Copy link
Contributor

echlebek commented May 7, 2018

When I try to use the example in the statsd documentation, I get an error.

This is an issue with:

  • Errata (fix needed for doc content)

Expected Behavior

echo "foo:1|c" | nc -u -w0 127.0.0.1 8125  # works, creates metrics

Current Behavior

Doesn't work.

Steps to Reproduce (for bugs)

$ echo "foo:1|c" | nc -u -w0 127.0.0.1 8125
Ncat: Invalid -w timeout (must be greater than 0). QUITTING.

Context

Discovered while doing beta QA.

  • OS: Fedora 26
@echlebek echlebek added the errata Error in documentation label May 7, 2018
@nikkictl
Copy link

nikkictl commented May 7, 2018

Good catch! The example here is more appropriate than this one.

@cwjohnston cwjohnston added the 2.x label May 18, 2018
@apaskulin
Copy link
Contributor

@apaskulin apaskulin added the good first issue Suitable for a new contributor to resolve label Aug 20, 2018
@apaskulin apaskulin added this to the Sensu 2.0 milestone Sep 24, 2018
@apaskulin apaskulin added in progress Currently being worked and removed next-for-development labels Oct 2, 2018
@apaskulin apaskulin self-assigned this Oct 2, 2018
@apaskulin apaskulin added ready for review PR is ready to review and removed in progress Currently being worked labels Oct 4, 2018
@apaskulin apaskulin removed the ready for review PR is ready to review label Oct 9, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
errata Error in documentation good first issue Suitable for a new contributor to resolve
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants