New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NPE in SleuthkitClient when generating report with a virtual disk #1870
Comments
…leuthkitClient.get()
Thanks for reporting and debugging @aberenguel! Could you detail how the report was being created? Not sure, but I think IPED/iped-engine/src/main/java/iped/engine/sleuthkit/SleuthkitInputStreamFactory.java Line 121 in f6eae92
Unless you are processing a new evidence together with report creation from command line, are you? |
I'm using the GUI to generate the report. |
Maybe an embedded disk was processed during report generation, that would call |
I think that is the answer. I my case I have two Android emulators related to some VMDK files. I exported the VMDK files, processed in PA and appended the UFDR in the case. |
Great! Try to turn |
The above VMDK file was detected like that by
|
Is there any way to disable the split of large binaries? |
It is not possible anymore, it is always enabled to avoid #1281. We should remove the |
Is it a single segment VMDK? Maybe it is just a VMDK part and IPED wasn't able to detect all its parts before exporting them and sending to TSK for decoding... |
Just removed them in commit af66ce9 |
…ted in SleuthkitClient.get() " This reverts commit 98a983d.
Using master branch (f6eae92).
The exception is:
Debugging the code, I checkout out none of
SleuthkitClient
instances were created when the methodSleuthkitClient.get()
was called. Maybe this happened due to slowness in my computer.I created a patch that uses conditional variables in to be verified in
SleuthkitClient.get()
and signalized ininitSleuthkitServers()
.Pushing soon.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: