Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(include): deep include with limit/offset #9900

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

sushantdhiman
Copy link
Contributor

Pull Request check-list

Please make sure to review and check all of these items:

  • Does npm run test or npm run test-DIALECT pass with this change (including linting)?
  • Does the description below contain a link to an existing issue (Closes #[issue]) or a description of the issue you are solving?
  • Have you added new tests to prevent regressions?
  • Is a documentation update included (if this change modifies existing APIs, or introduces new ones)?
  • Did you follow the commit message conventions explained in CONTRIBUTING.md?

Description of change

Fixes #9869

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 9, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #9900 into master will increase coverage by 5.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

offset: 1
}))
.then(result => {
expect(result.name).to.equal('David');
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this.Media.bulkCreate(build('mediaA', 'mediaB', 'mediaC', 'mediaD')),
this.File.bulkCreate(build('FileA', 'FileB'))
))
.spread((users, posts, comments, medias, files) => Promise.join(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: Use es6 spread instead.

@sushantdhiman sushantdhiman deleted the fix-deep-includes branch November 22, 2018 04:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants