Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(core): support for reporting dynamic task parameters #2380

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

jan-molak
Copy link
Member

@jan-molak jan-molak commented May 18, 2024

Notable changes:

  • Question about Masked.valueOf(..) is now a standalone class so that it can be detected as a special case when producing a parameterised description of a task

RE: #2223

Outstanding:

  • Consider renaming Masked.valueOf(..) to MaskedValue.of(..) so that it can be used as a MetaQuestion. This would require introducing a temporary/deprecated alias Masked.valueOf(..) to avoid breaking backwards compatibility

@jan-molak jan-molak marked this pull request as draft May 18, 2024 18:03
@jan-molak jan-molak self-assigned this May 18, 2024
this way masked values can be detected as a special case and we can avoid leaking secrets when
producing a parameterised description of an activity

Related tickets: re #2223
@jan-molak jan-molak force-pushed the features/task-parameter-reporting branch from 76c18f0 to 04a9f17 Compare May 18, 2024 20:22
…ptions of Activities

`description` is a new tag function that interprets the provided template literal to generate a
question which could be then used to describe any parameterised activities (tasks and interactions)

Related tickets: re #2223
…sing Questions

this allows the description to by determined dynamically when the activity is performed, and include
the actual value of any Answerable parameters passed to the description in the test execution report

Related tickets: re #2223
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant