Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Kerbal colour #17

Merged
1 commit merged into from
Dec 1, 2016
Merged

Add Kerbal colour #17

1 commit merged into from
Dec 1, 2016

Conversation

indiv0
Copy link
Contributor

@indiv0 indiv0 commented Dec 1, 2016

Adds the colour #BADA55.

@ghost ghost merged commit c032fbe into serenity-rs:master Dec 1, 2016
@indiv0 indiv0 deleted the feat-add-kerbal-colour branch December 1, 2016 00:56
@hsiW hsiW added enhancement An improvement to Serenity. Farming labels Dec 29, 2016
arqunis pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
arqunis pushed a commit to arqunis/serenity that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2024
…rs#2681)

This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
arqunis pushed a commit to arqunis/serenity that referenced this pull request Jan 5, 2024
…rs#2681)

This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
arqunis pushed a commit to arqunis/serenity that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2024
…rs#2681)

This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
arqunis pushed a commit to arqunis/serenity that referenced this pull request Jan 22, 2024
…rs#2681)

This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
arqunis pushed a commit to arqunis/serenity that referenced this pull request Mar 1, 2024
…rs#2681)

This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev added a commit to GnomedDev/serenity that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2024
…rs#2681)

This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev added a commit to GnomedDev/serenity that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2024
…rs#2681)

This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev added a commit to GnomedDev/serenity that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2024
…rs#2681)

This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 29, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev added a commit to GnomedDev/serenity that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2024
…rs#2681)

This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev added a commit to GnomedDev/serenity that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2024
…rs#2681)

This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev added a commit to GnomedDev/serenity that referenced this pull request May 14, 2024
…rs#2681)

This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev added a commit that referenced this pull request May 14, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev added a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev added a commit that referenced this pull request May 28, 2024
This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
GnomedDev added a commit to GnomedDev/serenity that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2024
…rs#2681)

This swaps fields that store `Option<Int>` for `Option<NonMaxInt>` where the
maximum value would be ludicrous. Since `nonmax` uses `NonZero` internally,
this gives us niche optimisations, so model sizes can drop some more.

I have had to include a workaround for [serenity-rs#17] in `optional_string` by making my
own `TryFrom<u64>`, so that should be removable once that issue is fixed.

[serenity-rs#17]: LPGhatguy/nonmax#17
This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement An improvement to Serenity.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants