Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Linux low latency fix (allow set without changing low latency mode) #2241

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 26, 2021

Conversation

GazHank
Copy link
Contributor

@GazHank GazHank commented Apr 29, 2021

Only set low Latency mode if lowLatency is defined

Proposed fix to address #2240

} else if(err == -2) {
snprintf(data->errorString, sizeof(data->errorString), "Error: %s, cannot set", strerror(errno));
return;
if (data->lowLatency) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

so if it's undefined or false its not set, and if it's true it is set? does this mean you can't turn it off? Would you ever want to turn it off?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@GazHank GazHank Apr 30, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @reconbot, thanks for the quick response :-)

I have to admit, toggling low latency on and off isn't really something I considered. Given how the user sets low latency within linux, and the use cases I've seen I don't know if toggling is common.

I'm not certain this is the best fix, and bigger change may be needed to fully address this feature, but my priorities when proposing this were:

  1. to get the set method to work again for people who don't need to invoke low latency mode
  2. continue to allow anyone who does want to invoke the low latency mode to enable it
  3. keep the change as small and low impact as possible (so we can fix point 1 asap)

As I understand it, the current code and the default behaviour of Linux are not aligned. In particular, I believe that in order to be able to invoke lowLatency mode you need to first change the default behaviour of the port, using something like: sudo setserial /dev/ttyUSB0 low_latency. As such, by default Linux will not allow you to invoke low latency mode in Serialport, however the code within the set method tries to configure it irrespective of the options the user supplies to the set method. Even specifying port.set({dtr: true, LowLatency: false }) or port.set({dtr: true}) will cause an attempt to set the low latency bit to zero and error out.

Having thought about this a little more, I wonder if the set method is really the right place to be activating low latency mode, since all of the other options within the set method are really control signals. I can't help thinking about low latency mode being more like setting the baud rate etc. As such it would seem to me to be more appropriate to allow it to be defined within the port open method, and within the update method. Of course we probably need to find a way to check if we have permission to enable low latency mode first otherwise we will continue to throw errors. The potential downside of treating low latency mode like baud rate is that baud rate has it's own get method, it would be a shame to have to add a get method just for this since it is platform specific.

Let me know if you would like me to try a different way to fix this

Cheers

Gareth

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Upon further investigation I think we need a better fix for this. I'll add more info to the issue based on my improved understanding of what's going on...

I will try to make a new PR to address this more completely ASAP, but until a better fix is available I still think this is an acceptable workaround to get the v9 code working on Linux for all users.

Per my comment in the issue, anyone placing a dependency on "serialport": "9.0.0" will get the broken version of bindings since the interdependence is specified as "^9.0.0".

@GazHank
Copy link
Contributor Author

GazHank commented May 1, 2021

Improved fix for low latency mode:

Changes

serialport_linux.cpp:

  • Revise the linux set method to only attempt an update if required (if the bit doesn't need to be flipped then don't attempt an unnecessary call for which we might not have permission)
  • Addition of a linux specific linuxGetLowLatencyMode method - for consistency with linuxGetSystemBaudRate, allowing removal of the logic from the more general unix code

serialport_linux.h:

  • Addition of a linux specific linuxGetLowLatencyMode method - for consistency with linuxGetSystemBaudRate

serialport_unix.cpp:

  • Revise sequence of set method - to allow control bits (e.g. dtr) to be set even if low latency fails
  • Revise sequence of get method - to allow control bits (e.g. dtr) to be returned even if get of low latency info fails
  • Revise get method to invoke linux specific method (point 2 above, and removing broken logic in the process)
  • Revise the error messages for the set and get messages for the low latency calls to make it clearer when these fail - since they are likely to fail when we don't have suitable access rights

Testing

Tested on Linux Ubuntu LTS and Win10:

Linux without admin rights

  • Set method call {dtr: true} - succeeds without error
  • Set method call {dtr: true, lowLatency: true} - dtr correctly set, error reported for lowLatency, but handled without issue
  • Get method call - succeeds without error

Linux with admin rights

  • Set method call {dtr: true} - succeeds without error
  • Set method call {dtr: true, lowLatency: true} - succeeds without error
  • Get method call - succeeds without error

Windows 10

  • Set method call {dtr: true} - succeeds without error
  • Set method call {dtr: true, lowLatency: true} - succeeds without error (lowLatency ignored)
  • Get method call - succeeds without error

Additional considerations

The the focus of this change was entirely on addressing errors per #2240 as such I have not performed any actual benchmarking of the lowLatency mode to check for changes to latency (or increases to CPU load - setserial has info on expected benefits/impacts).

@GazHank
Copy link
Contributor Author

GazHank commented May 1, 2021

@reconbot do let me know if you would like to discuss or revise any of these changes, or if you would prefer if I setup a new PR for this

Copy link
Member

@reconbot reconbot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the delay in review. I think you uncovered a bug, and also some feedback on simplifying the call to set.

return -2;
if (oldFlags != ss.flags)
{
if (ioctl(fd, TIOCSSERIAL, &ss)) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this is wrong - https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/ioctl.2.html#RETURN_VALUE

It should be a positive number on success not failure.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

agreed, looks like we should check for negative values to indicate errors instead:
if (ioctl(fd, TIOCSSERIAL, &ss) < 0) {

although the same also seems to be true for the setting the baud rate:
if (ioctl(fd, TCSETS2, &t)) { return -2; }
does that need a fix too?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think so

@@ -43,17 +43,34 @@ int linuxSetLowLatencyMode(const int fd, const bool enable) {
if (ioctl(fd, TIOCGSERIAL, &ss)) {
return -1;
}

int oldFlags = ss.flags;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lets see if oldFlags & ASYNC_LOW_LATENCY == enable and just return early if we don't have to do anything?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good shout that is lots nicer

@@ -332,17 +332,6 @@ void EIO_Set(uv_work_t* req) {
bits |= TIOCM_DSR;
}

#if defined(__linux__)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

good move

ss.flags &= ~ASYNC_LOW_LATENCY;
}
if (ss.flags & ASYNC_LOW_LATENCY != enable) {

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just a nitpick it's better to return early than it is to nest

if (oldFlags != ss.flags)
{
if (ioctl(fd, TIOCSSERIAL, &ss)) {
if (ioctl(fd, TIOCSSERIAL, &ss) < 0) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

another nitpick ioctl will always return -1 on error never anything else

@reconbot reconbot merged commit fb53b99 into serialport:master May 26, 2021
lvogt pushed a commit to lvogt/node-serialport that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2021
…serialport#2241)

* only set lowLatency if defined
* fix set and get methods for low_latency
* clarify error messages

Proposed fix to address serialport#2240
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants