Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update @types/node to the latest version 🚀 #7

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 23, 2017

Conversation

greenkeeper[bot]
Copy link

@greenkeeper greenkeeper bot commented Jun 19, 2017

Version 8.0.0 of @types/node just got published.

Dependency @types/node
Current Version 7.0.32
Type devDependency

The version 8.0.0 is not covered by your current version range.

Without accepting this pull request your project will work just like it did before. There might be a bunch of new features, fixes and perf improvements that the maintainers worked on for you though.

I recommend you look into these changes and try to get onto the latest version of @types/node.
Given that you have a decent test suite, a passing build is a strong indicator that you can take advantage of these changes by merging the proposed change into your project. Otherwise this branch is a great starting point for you to work on the update.


Not sure how things should work exactly?

There is a collection of frequently asked questions and of course you may always ask my humans.


Your Greenkeeper Bot 🌴

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jun 19, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 77.698% when pulling aa6aaa1 on greenkeeper/@types/node-8.0.0 into 51e0b3d on master.

@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Jun 20, 2017

Version 8.0.1 just got published.

Update to this version instead 🚀

@blakeembrey blakeembrey merged commit c3337d3 into master Jun 23, 2017
@blakeembrey blakeembrey deleted the greenkeeper/@types/node-8.0.0 branch June 23, 2017 14:39
@greenkeeper
Copy link
Author

greenkeeper bot commented Jun 23, 2017

Version 8.0.2 just got published.

Update to this version instead 🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants