Question on the output of contacts

[tengssh]

Hi,

Thank you for cc3d! I find it very helpful and efficient for labelling domains in 3D system.
Maybe I misunderstood the use of "contacts" function, but when I try to input a 3x3x3 array like this:

data = np.ones((3,3,3))
data[1,1,1]=2
labels_out = cc3d.connected_components(data, connectivity=6)
cc3d.contacts(labels_out, connectivity=6, surface_area=True)

and it gives me
{(1,2): 4.0}

Shouldn't it be 6 instead of 4, e.g. top-bottom, front-back, left-right?
Thank you!

[william-silversmith]

Yup, that looks like a bug to me. Let me check it out.

[william-silversmith]

I've just uploaded a new version to PyPI! Please give it a test and let me know if that solves it for you.

[tengssh]

Yes, it solves the problem and the results now make more sense to me.
Btw, would it be possible to implement a periodic boundary condition? I understand that experimental images may not consider it, but having this option for simulations would be cool.
Thank you again for solving this issue!

[william-silversmith]

Glad that helped! I don't think I understand what is meant by a periodic boundary condition. Can you elaborate?

…

On Wed, Apr 3, 2024, 11:31 AM Shenghan ***@***.***> wrote: Yes, it solves the problem and the results now make more sense to me. Btw, would it be possible to implement a periodic boundary condition? I understand that experimental images may not consider it, but having this option for simulations would be cool. Thank you again for solving this issue! — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#116 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AATGQSPPCEHXE642PK6PD6TY3QOEFAVCNFSM6AAAAABFTZZNN2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAMZUHEZTGNRXGA> . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[tengssh]

Hi,

It means that D(x)=D(x+L), where L is the length of the box along x, so that in the following case:

data = np.array([[3,3,0,3,3]])
labels_out = cc3d.connected_components(data, connectivity=6)

Thereby instead of array([[1,1,0,2,2]], dtype=unit16) it will output array([[1,1,0,1,1]], dtype=unit16) if periodic boundary condition is applied.
Maybe this wiki would be helpful in explaining what I meant.

[william-silversmith]

Oh I see what you mean. That's an interesting application. I'll consider it.

[william-silversmith]

Would you need support for 6 connected only? It's a lot more tractable to support it for a limited number of connectives. I believe there are 8 separate CCL implementations in the codebase: 4, 8, 6, 18, 26, and three continuous domain versions. I don't think I'd have time to do more than a few of them.

[william-silversmith]

Might be good to continue this conversation here: #117

[tengssh]

Would you need support for 6 connected only? It's a lot more tractable to support it for a limited number of connectives. I believe there are 8 separate CCL implementations in the codebase: 4, 8, 6, 18, 26, and three continuous domain versions. I don't think I'd have time to do more than a few of them.

Thank you! I think 6 should be enough.