-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 711
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Wrong scale values #48
Comments
I have same question. e.g.) ssd.pytorch ...
s_k = self.min_sizes[k]/self.image_size
...
Where |
Author says "An alternative way of improving SSD is to design a better tiling of default boxes so
EDIT: |
Hello, it's been a while since I read the paper, so I don't remember my thought process regarding why I went ahead with a scale of 0,1 for Looking at the paper now, in Section 3.1 (Page 7), it is stated the
So does this mean This is apparent in their wording throughout the paper. At the end of page 7:
Here too, the scale for On page 11:
I don't remember if my understanding of this is as clear now as it was when I wrote the code, but this is all I can tell you now, off the top of my head. I'm sure I must have been confused at that time too, and I must've checked with other repositories to confirm. This paper is a little too empirical sometimes. |
Oh, it's written!!! |
which relationship between anchors and min_size. Suppose I have 6 anchors box (w:h) (100,50)(125:75)(150:175), (175,180),(205,175),(235,153). How to calculate min_size, max_size. Thanks in advance if share the formular. |
These are the values used in
In paper this values are used:
![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/47481781/79556866-5067d880-80aa-11ea-9a50-2418d93d1f86.png)
Proper values are:
0.2 , 0.34, 0.48, 0.62, 0.76, 0.9
Code to check:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: