New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Dependencies in CacheFlow aren't always necessarily output -> input #54

Open

sgtlambda opened this issue Jul 31, 2017 · 0 comments

Owner

sgtlambda commented Jul 31, 2017

Example:

  - cmd: yarn install
    input:
      - package.json
      - yarn.lock
    output: node_modules

  - cmd: yarn run production
    input:
      - package.json
      - resources/assets
    output:
      - public

Proposed solution:

Introduce new "dependencies" field where one could define either depended-on files, or commands.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment