-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 236
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make clippy happy #2587
Make clippy happy #2587
Conversation
this just disable some lints which should probably not: some of what they point too seems to be actual UB.
`missing_safety_doc` is to be ignored for clippy to be trully happy
Codecov ReportBase: 67.04% // Head: 67.07% // Increases project coverage by
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2587 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 67.04% 67.07% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 197 195 -2
Lines 29171 29018 -153
Branches 5743 5708 -35
==========================================
- Hits 19558 19464 -94
+ Misses 5055 5020 -35
+ Partials 4558 4534 -24
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report at Codecov. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the PR!
@trinity-1686a thanks for the PR! Just FYI, we're going to wait for review from @sporksmith to help address some of the remaining items before moving forward. |
Thanks for the cleanup! Once this gets merged maybe we should think about adding clippy to our lints GH workflow. |
Clippy had many complains. I tried to fix those I could, and added explicit
allow(clippy::...)
for the others.I left
missing_safety_doc
alone: it triggers a lot, but in most case I'd lack the knowledge to actually do something intelligent about it.