-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 560
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
REGR: fix __eq__ to not ignore z values #1829
REGR: fix __eq__ to not ignore z values #1829
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good! I haven't had a chance to test this PR locally, but the changes and tests all look good. Only a few minor remarks to consider.
all_types_z = ( | ||
point_z, | ||
line_string_z, | ||
polygon_z, | ||
multi_point_z, | ||
multi_line_string_z, | ||
multi_polygon_z, | ||
polygon_with_hole_z, | ||
geometry_collection_z, | ||
empty_point_z, | ||
empty_line_string_z, | ||
) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I have a draft PR with some very similar items, but I'll work with this version to start with.
Co-authored-by: Mike Taves <mwtoews@gmail.com>
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 5630011376Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.
Details
💛 - Coveralls |
Closes #1732
Broken off from #1760, to just restore the previous behaviour (using the previous implementaiton) and already add the more extensive tests that I wrote for that PR. This way, the other PR can focus more on the API change.