Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Release Workflow Fixes #1565

Merged

Conversation

adambkaplan
Copy link
Member

Changes

Fixes for the release workflow to support release branches:

  • Print input parameters at the start of the workflow.
  • Use input git reference for release.
  • Sign image using sha of the tag's git commit.

/kind cleanup

Submitter Checklist

  • Includes tests if functionality changed/was added
  • Includes docs if changes are user-facing
  • Set a kind label on this PR
  • Release notes block has been filled in, or marked NONE

See the contributor guide
for details on coding conventions, github and prow interactions, and the code review process.

Release Notes

NONE

Fixes for the release workflow to support release branches:

- Print input parameters at the start of the workflow.
- Use input git reference for release.
- Sign image using sha of the tag's git commit.

Signed-off-by: Adam Kaplan <adam.kaplan@redhat.com>
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 1, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added release-note-none Label for when a PR does not need a release note kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. labels Apr 1, 2024
Copy link
Member

@SaschaSchwarze0 SaschaSchwarze0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one typo.

.github/workflows/release.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +63 to +64
# TODO: This action is no longer mainained. We should use a different action
# or the gh command line directly.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you open an issue instead or in addition?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done: #1567

Correct a typo in YAML comment.

Co-authored-by: Sascha Schwarze <schwarzs@de.ibm.com>
Copy link
Member

@SaschaSchwarze0 SaschaSchwarze0 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 2, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 2, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: SaschaSchwarze0

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 2, 2024
@SaschaSchwarze0 SaschaSchwarze0 added this to the release-v0.14.0 milestone Apr 2, 2024
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit e166016 into shipwright-io:main Apr 2, 2024
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Label for when a PR does not need a release note size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants