Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define all HTML5 elements for text.html-lite #363

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 10, 2018

Conversation

tabe
Copy link
Contributor

@tabe tabe commented Jul 18, 2018

... based on "HTML5.2 W3C Recommendation, 14 December 2017" [1].

[2]'s section "3.1 New Elements" is also useful for finding
newly added elements in HTML5.

[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-html52-20171214/
[2] https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-html5-diff-20141209/

... based on "HTML5.2 W3C Recommendation, 14 December 2017" [1].

[2]'s section "3.1 New Elements" is also useful for finding
newly added elements in HTML5.

[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-html52-20171214/
[2] https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-html5-diff-20141209/
@@ -165,10 +165,6 @@

(define-html-elements body address div)

;; SEMANTIC ELEMENT
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the "semantic element" group, should we keep it (and maybe add more)? And have a separate group for html5 non-semantics elements?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No idea about what the "SEMANTIC ELEMENT" means.
As far as I can tell, neither HTML 5.2 specification (nor previous versions of HTML5) defines such a group of elements.
In fact the document says that (all) "Elements, attributes, and attribute values in HTML are defined (by this specification) to have certain meanings (semantics)." [1]
Found only some informal pages talking about the distinction of "semantic" ones from others when searching "html semantic non-semantic elements" via google.

[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/html5/dom.html#elements-semantics

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Never mind. I looked back in history and this group is html5 (in d73d2c1). So yeah looking good. Sorry for the noise.

@shirok
Copy link
Owner

shirok commented Aug 10, 2018

Thanks @tabe .

@shirok shirok merged commit 65c5721 into shirok:master Aug 10, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants