New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Define all HTML5 elements for text.html-lite #363

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Aug 10, 2018

Conversation

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@tabe
Copy link
Contributor

tabe commented Jul 18, 2018

... based on "HTML5.2 W3C Recommendation, 14 December 2017" [1].

[2]'s section "3.1 New Elements" is also useful for finding
newly added elements in HTML5.

[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-html52-20171214/
[2] https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-html5-diff-20141209/

Define all HTML5 elements for text.html-lite
... based on "HTML5.2 W3C Recommendation, 14 December 2017" [1].

[2]'s section "3.1 New Elements" is also useful for finding
newly added elements in HTML5.

[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-html52-20171214/
[2] https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-html5-diff-20141209/
@@ -165,10 +165,6 @@

(define-html-elements body address div)

;; SEMANTIC ELEMENT

This comment has been minimized.

@pclouds

pclouds Jul 18, 2018

Contributor

This is the "semantic element" group, should we keep it (and maybe add more)? And have a separate group for html5 non-semantics elements?

This comment has been minimized.

@tabe

tabe Jul 19, 2018

Contributor

No idea about what the "SEMANTIC ELEMENT" means.
As far as I can tell, neither HTML 5.2 specification (nor previous versions of HTML5) defines such a group of elements.
In fact the document says that (all) "Elements, attributes, and attribute values in HTML are defined (by this specification) to have certain meanings (semantics)." [1]
Found only some informal pages talking about the distinction of "semantic" ones from others when searching "html semantic non-semantic elements" via google.

[1] https://www.w3.org/TR/html5/dom.html#elements-semantics

This comment has been minimized.

@pclouds

pclouds Jul 20, 2018

Contributor

Never mind. I looked back in history and this group is html5 (in d73d2c1). So yeah looking good. Sorry for the noise.

@shirok

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Owner

shirok commented Aug 10, 2018

Thanks @tabe .

@shirok shirok merged commit 65c5721 into shirok:master Aug 10, 2018

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment