Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

added django-like filtering support to Query #108

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2018
Merged

added django-like filtering support to Query #108

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2018

Conversation

miki725
Copy link
Collaborator

@miki725 miki725 commented Dec 19, 2018

No description provided.

@miki725 miki725 requested a review from shosca December 19, 2018 00:20
@miki725 miki725 force-pushed the django-filter branch 2 times, most recently from a7329b9 to cd072cd Compare December 19, 2018 01:02
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Dec 19, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 952

  • 43 of 43 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 5 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 943: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 3283
Relevant Lines: 3283
💛 - Coveralls

shosca
shosca reviewed Dec 19, 2018
View reviewed changes
django_sorcery/db/query.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
shosca
shosca approved these changes Dec 19, 2018
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Owner

@shosca shosca left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

very nice!

@shosca shosca merged commit a3d75cf into master Dec 19, 2018
@shosca shosca deleted the django-filter branch December 19, 2018 15:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@shosca shosca shosca approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@miki725 @coveralls @shosca